|
|
 |
Biopics are quite popular in Hollywood and scoop up Oscars by
the dozen. Now Bollywood too is getting enamoured by this genre
of films. What makes them tick? Shoma A. Chatterji analyses
In the library or bookshelves at home,
the books in the 'biography' category are mostly relegated to
a corner, desperately waiting for readers or scholars to explore
the mysteries of what is behind the greatness of these immortal
human beings. But cinema is different. It has the capacity of
converting what might otherwise seem dull and boring to fun
and entertainment, spilling over with sound and fury, dance
and music. Mani Ratnam's latest, Guru, reinforces the popularity
of the biopic genre among filmmakers in Indian mainstream cinema.
Recent trends reveal the rise of this genre with films like
Black, Sarkar and The Rising among others that define the desire
among sterling filmmakers to use life as entertainment. Biopic
is a term derived from the combination of the words "biography"
and "pictures." These films depict and dramatise the
life of an important historical personage (or group) from the
past or present era. Sometimes, historical biopics stretch the
truth and tell a life story with varying degrees of accuracy.
Big-screen biopics cross many genre types. An outlaw finds great
favour with the Indian audience, the best example being Yash
Chopra's Deewar loosely adapted from the life of notorious smuggler
Haji Mastaan. Dayavan, based on yet another mafia leader, with
Vinod Khanna in the title role, was not that popular. Ramgopal
Varma's Sarkar, on the other hand, is said to have taken generous
helpings from the life of the controversial political leader
Balasaheb Thackeray.
The Indian biopic where life stories are metamorphosed and presented
as fiction goes back probably to Guru Dutt's Kaagaz Ke Phool
(1959). The film has strong autobiographical elements structured
into it. It is almost like a celluloid elegy Dutt wrote for
himself with his screenplay and his images, his music and his
lyrical pacing of the film. He is said to have had an intense
relationship with one of his leading ladies, as shown in the
film. He was the one who introduced the lady to the world of
cinema. This brought about phases of estrangement with wife
Geeta Dutt and the children from time to time. He began to indulge
in drinking during periods when he was not working and suffered
from long periods of depression. It is said that his premature
death by suicide was foreshadowed in the film.
Shyam Benegal's Bhoomika (1976) was adapted from the autobiography
of Hansa Wadkar, a famous Marathi actress of the 1930s. Smita
Patil played the actress whose early childhood memories are
filled with an alcoholic father, a grumpy mother and her conniving
lover. The mother's lover marries Usha when she grows up and
then lives off her earnings as a star. But when she finds this
suffocating and constricting her personal freedom, she breaks
free, only to try and find solace in the arms of different men.
Her dilemma is ironic because she is an actress doomed to play
a variety of roles but confused about her own role in real life.
Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Black (2005) is till date the most powerful
and positive film of all biopics made in recent history. Based
on the life of Helen Keller and her famous teacher, Bhansali
brings about a magical twist by changing the gender of the teacher
from female to male and casting Amitabh Bachchan in the role.
Bhansali Indianised the story and relocated it to much later
period. But his actors and his brilliant technical crew triumphed
in making Black a film to remember him by.
The same, however, is not true of Ketan Mehta's Mangal Pandey
The Rising (2005.) Though Mehta claimed it was historically
authentic and kept the names of the characters unchanged, the
film failed to convince those who were looking for history in
the film and those who aspired to seek entertainment through
a period film filled with colourful costumes and loud drama.
In fact, two descendants of the martyr sought a ban on the film's
screening. They filed a suit seeking an unconditional apology
from those involved in the making of the film for allegedly
showing Pandey as a drunkard involved in a relationship with
a prostitute. All said and done, however, the film managed to
rekindle some interest in Mandal Pandey, the first hero of the
1857 Sepoy Mutiny.
We have yet to produce something that even remotely resembles
A Beautiful Mind (2001), with Russell Crowe as the troubled
mathematician John Nash Jr, controversies notwithstanding. Citizen
Kane (1941) was reportedly patterned after the life story of
William Randolph Hearst. It still is a landmark in the history
of film studies. Billy Wilder's The Spirit of St. Louis (1957)
dramatised the historical figure of 27-year old Charles Lindbergh.
Dustin Hoffman starred as tormented comedian Lenny Bruce in
Lenny (1974), and Rod Steiger played the title role of Chicago's
famous mobster in Al Capone (1959). Amadeus (1984), directed
by Milos Forman, viewed the antics of young musical prodigy
Mozart. Woody Allen's Sweet and Lowdown (1999) is a mock-biography
of a fictional 1930s jazz guitarist named Emmett Ray. Sidney
Pollack's Out of Africa (1985) depicts the life of Karen Blixen
who wrote under the name of Isak Dinesen.
The Last King of Scotland the Academy Award nominated
2006 British film also falls in biopic category as it revolves
around how a young Scottish doctor, Nicholas Garrigan, becomes,
by chance, the personal physician to the new Ugandan President
Idi Amin and descends ever deeper into the moral corruption
of Amin's Uganda.
Mani Ratnam keeps denying that Guru is inspired by the life
story of the father of Reliance, namely, the late Dhirubhai
Ambani. But there are too many parallels between Ambani and
the Guru, brilliantly performed by a mature Abhishek Bachchan
to concede. The self-made tycoon who made polyester a household
word has echoes in the film too. What stops all denials by Ratnam
is the meeting called by Guru in a stadium full of shareholders
in the last episode. This real-life event from late Ambanis
life is too well-known to be fictitious. What Ratnam achieves
is to turn this life-story into an entertaining film instead
of reducing it to a dull documentary.
The biopic, it appears, has come to stay. And now we await Jodha-Akbar,
the love story of Akbar and Jodhabai of Rajasthan. Biopics,
it seems are here to stay for sometime.
|
|
|